Tuesday, June 19, 2007


Gasoline prices to drop
Drop in refiner capacity makes consumers pay

News release

Paradise, NL, June 19, 2007- Gasoline will come a little cheaper for consumers in Newfoundland and Labrador this week as prices are forecast to drop by a rough 3.3 cents a litre with 13 days out of 14 to report from, that’s according to George Murphy of the Consumer Group for Fair Gas Prices. Heating and stove oils are showing an increase of close to 6/10ths of a cent over the same time period.

“A look at the numbers from last weeks inventory data shows that Big Oil is making consumers pay for their past folly. We’ve seen Big Oil pay out big money to shareholders rather than make the strategic investments in refineries maintenance. Every time we see a refinery outage, we see the fruits of that. If refiner capacity drops against consumer demand, they still win,” said Murphy.

“Right now, Big Oil is heavily dependent upon foreign imports of refined product. That will be a strategic mistake to the consumer if demand picks up in other centres where this refined product is coming from. If the markets lose these imports to the North American market, we could see some sharp rises in pricing to the consumer. Because they’re not refining enough to keep up with demand and relying heavily on imports, we’ve effectively seen the creation of a ‘house of cards’ on the markets that the consumer could end up paying for in the end.

“Refinery capacity dropped in an Energy Information Administration report from last week. Numbers last week showed that capacity dropped in the gasoline demand period to fall to 89.2 per cent. While the same report showed a very modest growth in gasoline inventory, the numbers remained very bullish to traders. Numbers for the rest of the regulation period started to trade up again erasing some of last weeks predicted five cent drop at the pumps that should have happened.

“What is odd with the increase on heating and stove oils is that demand for distillates has increased over the same period last year. I’m still worried that there is going to be a sustained increase in heating and stove oils this winter if Big Oil doesn’t address refining problems. We’re still not seeing big increases in inventories of that fuel group, nor are we seeing drops in the cost price of those fuels. Spots are a rough two cents over what they were for the same timeframe last year.”

“People should be concerned that numbers for heating and stove oils aren’t backing down the way they normally would. This is the time of year that we’ve seen those figures back down but they aren’t. If this keeps up and nothing changes, we’ll be back into relief programs for those who can’t afford to pay for heat again and governments will be forced to act in response to Big Oil’s folly. We’re getting too dependent upon foreign imports to catch us when the markets are failing us.”


-30-

For more information, contact;

George Murphy
Group researcher/Member

Thursday, June 14, 2007



Standing by my numbers
Prices should have dropped to consumers-PPO needs to explain

News release

Paradise, NL, June 14, 2007- “Pricing to consumers in Newfoundland and Labrador should have come down and the Petroleum Pricing Office needs to explain why they never,” according to George Murphy, group researcher and member of the Consumer Group for Fair Gas prices.

“I know my numbers were solid this time around. Numbers from the markets after weekend trading showed a solid 4.37 cents a litre down (5.0/Litre taxes in) and they held that trend right up to Tuesday trading close. Markets showed a 5.1 cent a litre drop coming then. I know my numbers were right and I’ll stand by them. Consumers should be looking at five cents a litre down this morning but they aren’t. My numbers fall well within the requirement of four cents a litre up or down in movement for the interrupter formula to work,” said Murphy.

“Other centers like Nova Scotia and New Brunswick saw pricing drop well below what we have here and that’s now all out of sync. Traditionally, what I have noticed was that we would follow in price drops and be close to what pricing would be in those provinces. If they’re using New York Mercantile Exchange numbers, then there is something wrong here. All three of my sources can’t be wrong.

“The last three price changes were just about dead on. Two weeks ago showed they were dead accurate while last week’s price change was out by 2/10ths of a cent. I work on a margin of error of 3/10ths. My numbers exceeded that this week, enough to show interruption and that resulted in the predicted drop coming at the pumps. Rather than miss this one by three tenths, I must have missed this one by a couple of extra hundredths. Frankly, I’m disappointed that the companies just didn’t drop prices ahead of schedule while the impetus is there. If there is any good news it’s that we’re still on track for a 5.1 cent a litre drop next week with eight days out of a possible 14 recorded.”

-30-

For more information, contact;

George Murphy
Consumer Group for Fair Gas prices

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Go light on the golden stuff
Gasoline to drop this coming Thursday if the numbers hold today

News release

Paradise, NL, June 12, 2007- Unless there is a drastic increase in the price of gasoline in the markets today, it is likely that consumers will catch another break at the pumps as the Petroleum Pricing Office will have to use their interrupter formula, that’s according to George Murphy of the Consumer Group for Fair Gas Prices.

“Good builds in gasoline inventories over the past three weeks have taken some of the early worries on high summer pricing out of the markets, at least for this week and that is going to translate into a five cent drop at the pumps this coming Thursday morning if the numbers hold so, word here is ‘go light on the gold stuff’,” Murphy said.

“This interruption will bring our spot pricing average down towards the 60 cent a litre basic cost price for gasoline. Gasoline pricing in the markets will have to trade at 65 cents a litre today for any decrease not to happen. This decrease is representative of what Big Oil has seen in the markets; consumers hitting that brick wall on pricing. Demand didn’t show any strong increase to match what was being added to inventories. Demand numbers showed a 1.5 per cent increase against last years’ numbers, a number that showed some weakening against the inventory build.

“While we have already hit a new all-time record on pricing, it doesn’t mean that we’ll see continued drops in pricing. We could see a reversal of this downwards trend as people start their summer vacations. We’re not ready to ease back on warnings of record pricing this summer quite yet although any continued build in inventories would be of benefit to the consumer. If prices drop this week, it would bring pricing down to levels last seen a year ago. That still is reflective of the predicted pricing range that we’ve hit once already.”
-30-

For more information, contact;

George Murphy
Group researcher/Member
Consumer Group for Fair Gas Prices
(709)782-8053
(709)685-6186 cellular

Saturday, June 09, 2007




This could get interesting...
Gasoline to drop...Again?...


Call it what you will, but the fact that U.S interest rates are on the rise just might be of benefit to consumers here in Newfoundland and Labrador this week and possibly other gasoline users in other provinces.

Why?

U.S interest rates are rising because demand for some consumables is dropping. If that happens, as in all likelihood they are, then it may be a sign that inflation is increasing. If that is so, then watchers are predicting a drop in demand of petroleum products.

Of course, a good build in gasoline inventories this week also did its little part in bringing this about.

So far, with five out of a possible seven days data available, it looks like Newfoundland and Labrador consumers are looking at a possible drop at the pumps of a nickel. Could be more than that if Monday and Tuesdays' trading days also figure lower.

Be warned of a possible price drop this week...That's a change isn't it?...

Thought so.

Go light on the liquid gold for now. I'll have more in a release sometime on Tuesday to all the media in our neck of the woods.

Regards,

George

Saturday, June 02, 2007

Still pointing "down"
After twelve days out of a possible 14, gasoline pricing is still projected to show a modest drop to Newfoundland and Labrador consumers.
A moderately good inventory report from the Energy Information Administration in the United States this week shows that, while refiner capacity may not have increased, inventories of gasoline showed a slight increase for the second week in a row. Hopefully, this coming Wednesday's report will show a third consecutive.
A "brick wall" has been hit this last couple of weks it seems. Maybe consumers are finally getting the conservation message and maybe they've come to realize that the prices they were seeing at the pumps simply weren't justified under any conditions.
What you did see the past couple of weeks was the realisation that inventory shortfalls and refiner capacity have come into question and they both remain as proof of the oil companies will to manipulate supply and demand. Because they've cut back on the number of operating refineries, they can't produce what the market needs. Because they didn't sink money into refinery maintenance, any shutdown only added to the upwards spurt in gasoline and heating oil spot prices.
Either way, for Big Oil, it's "win-win".
Anyways, if you're in Newfoundland and Labrador, so far we're looking at 3.8 cents a litre down at the pumps with two business days to go. Heating oils and stove oils both show a rough half cent down.
Here's hopin'!...
Regards,
George

Thursday, May 31, 2007


Attention Newfoundland and Labrador!

All areas to see a drop in prices


When prices are adjusted next week to pricing for Newfoundland and Labrador consumers, we should catch a break at the pumps.

So far, as of yesterdays market close, we're looking at 2.8 cents a litre. If the trend continues, it should be something more than that.

Nova Scotia and New Brunswick consumers should get to see the benefits of the drop this coming Friday.

Take notice and spread the word to hold off on consumption, or, at least buy in some moderation until these drops hit. Looks like the consumer out there may have hit the brick wall on pricing.
I'll have more on this to come.



Monday, May 28, 2007

Drop gasoline taxes to aid tourism industry,” says consumer group

News release

Paradise, NL, May 28, 2007 – The provincial government should drop a portion of gasoline taxes in the province as an incentive to improve the tourism industry. A cut in the tax would be beneficial to Newfoundland and Labrador residents and those from out of province who see high gasoline pricing as a potential barrier to making the province a vacation destination this year.

“We know that gasoline pricing is high and is expected to stay that way for the rest of the summer but, besides governments’ strategic investments in advertising, it needs to give a financial incentive to consumers who they hope to draw to rural areas to spend some vacation money. Government has to be seen to be doing something for us as vacationers and for those who could potentially want to visit us,” said George Murphy, group researcher and member of the Consumer Group for Fair Gas Prices.

“Last year, we made the call to drop some of the taxes on gasoline. Government said at the time, that they couldn’t. Their reasoning was that high pricing led to a drop in consumption and that meant less taxes collected. Contrary to what government said at the time, that’s not how it worked out. Last year, government collected $145 million, well up from the $142.5 collected in the year previous. This year, they are projecting nearly $147 million to be raised through gasoline taxes. Past numbers alone prove that people still had to buy gasoline, although the price was still high. They just didn’t go out of their way to visit as in other years.

“The increase in tourism numbers for the St. John’s area showed that there was more airline traffic into the city. Tourism numbers were up slightly in the St. John’s and surrounding area last year, but rural areas suffered a different fate. Rural areas didn’t have that same advantage and we need to give them a fighting chance at getting tourism revenue up. We also need to give the Newfoundland and Labradorian tourist the incentive to stay at home; give them a chance to explore our own province.

“Numbers were down from years previous by a few percentage points. Last year, we saw a sharp upwards increase in pricing that peaked during the first week of July. This year, they’ve hit last year’s numbers already. Pricing is expected to stay higher and for a longer time this summer. That could mean trouble for everyone and we’ll need to depend more on our own people to support our rural tourism markets.

“I think that consumers here already recognize the need for road and bridge work. We also have heard that government is intent on spending a “record” $66 million on roads and related infrastructure, a far cry from the money they have collected in the past from gasoline and other motive taxes. We’re not asking for much besides recognition from government that we have problem with high pricing. A cut of some four cents on a litre in gasoline taxes for the summer is not an unreasonable amount to ask for. What it symbolizes is that recognition, that as tourists and consumers, we are made to feel that we’re welcome at home too.”


-30-


For more information, contact;

George Murphy
Group researcher/ Member
Consumer Group for Fair Gas Prices
(709)782-8053
(709)685-6186 cellular
My blog:
www.gasandoil.blogspot.com
Email: gasprices@hotmail.com, gasprices@nl.rogers.com

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

It's all about the refinery problem, but should it be?
You're hearing an awful lot about refinery problems and the ability of refineries to shove more expensive crude through the refinery system.
You're also hearing that demand and supply are in delicate balance and that inventories of gasoline remain low.
What you hear is all about what the markets want you to know and not about what they should be telling you. They've compromised the economy by taking a product like gasoline and increasing it incrementally to the point that it rises far ahead of the world inflation rate. It must be the only product in the world that can do that.
But, here we are at record prices, and Newfoundland and Labrador consumers will take another 3.6 cents a litre hit on Thursday morning, May 24th.
Hit the pumps again!
Hurts too...
What makes this one specially hard is the fact that the new price you'll see will be an all-time record outside of the couple of days in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Last year saw a record $1.22.5 a litre. Thursday should show $1.23.4 or close to it.
What also hurts is the fact that heating and stove oils are set to increase, albeit just a couple of tenths up. Reality tells me that tis the season for pricing to head the other way for a winter commodity. It just ain't happenin'!...
What kills me about all this is that Big Oil has been long quoting the Nigeria situation explaining the need for the best crude oil the world. What they haven't explained is the fact that oil is so expensive when there is plenty of the cheaper type crudes out there. Not everything that is available out there has to be a West Texas Intermediate, although it would be nice. The reality of the markets are telling consumers that we can get by without the expensive stuff and so should you.
Remember, Big Oil...You're making record dollars in refining. We shouldn't have to be made to follow the piper on this one. You created the refinery breakdown problem when you didn't invest big money into refinery maintenance. You must have known this would be a problem in the future.
Or, was it the need for better returns for your shareholders that caused all this? The scenario: well, if we don't invest in our refineries, we get to save money. When they break down, we get to reap the benefits of a fuel shortage!
Funny...
For some reason, I just don't think that Big Oil had the consumer need at heart when they let that card slip from up the sleve.
Question is: what else have they got?
Regards,
George


Thursday, May 17, 2007


All pricing up...
Markets just don't reflect the reality

Watching the markets today?
Oil?
Yup. You know what's coming!...
If you happen to be close on empty right now, may I suggest a fill-up, because you know what you are going to see in the morning.
In the United States, you will be looking at another couple of pennies on a gallon while, here in Canada, you will see close to another two cents on a litre. Make note of the date on the blog here because when you come back again, conditions may have changed.
In Newfoundland and Labrador, while prices here won't be changed again until next Thursday, there is a guarentee that we'll be looking at close to another 4 cents on a litre at the pumps if all conditions stay the same.
Well, why?...
Today the markets are trading on speculation that there are going to be refinery issues this summer. That's not unlike when Hurricane Katrina blew in over the Gulf Coast in 2005. Back then, there was a promise of refinery disruptions that eventually came true. While nothing like that has happened yet, the markets are trading on future, perceived problems that HAVE YET TO OCCUR.
That's what's wrong with the gas pricing picture. We're paying for something now, rather than on what can actually happen.
That's like betting on the Toronto Maple Leafs winning Lord Stanley's mug; hardly likely this year but entirely likely in the next twenty years.
Yes, the Leafs will win the cup but it hasn't happened yet...
Traders are betting on your future. Let's hope they lose their shirts, but, right now, someone on the New York Mercantile Exchange is making a heck of a lot of commission and Big Oil loves them for it.
Conspiracy? Dunno about that, but certainly a symbiotic relationship!
Regards,
George

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

The promise of increases to come...
Nigeria disruptions to supply, inventory losses, refinery problems...

We hear every day now, that pricing will rise further to consumers and that there is no relief in sight. What we do know is that refiners have been making a fortune and so have their Big Oil cousins. All said, the promise is there for pricing to hit record levels, especially after todays news.

The situation in Nigeria is a restless one. When oil was discovered there some years back, it brought with it the promise of a better life for those who didn't know the wealth to be gleaned from the underground resource. All that was heard was that "things wuld get a whole lot better".

They haven't...

Especially in the resource rich Niger delta where most of the resource is located.

The people there live in squalor and they have yet to see any tangible benefits like money for education, roads and infrastructure.

Where is Big Oil in this?

Does Big Oil have a responsibility to look after a people when it goes for their resources, especially when a government like that of Nigeria fails them? Should Big Oil continue to rape a resource knowing that the harvest of which can bring the problems that have come to be realised?

What of the next country?

Next time you go to the pumps, consider this:

If I have to pay high prices for a product that is succeptible to the pressures of a geo-political situation in Africa, should I have to see pump pricing that DEPENDS on a resource from that region? Should I be worried that someone is smacking a hole in a pipeline to get part of a product that I can take for granted at the pumps of Young Street in Toronto or Kenmount Road in St. John's?

Should geo-political problems elsewhere be the determining factor in the resons why Canada should have its own sources of supply rather than be dependent on someone else's resource, namely Nigeria's?

Toady, Shell announced that it has lost another 170k barrels a day in crude oil production from that country and so far, the markets are pointing up on the news. The promise is there at this time, to see another couple of cents on the pump price by tomorrow morning, all for the simple sake that the citizens of the Niger Delta are looking for their piece of the oil-rich pie: for fairness and fair treatment.

Perhaps it is time we look at ourselves and a secure supply for Canada, not just for our sake but for the sake of a people who are thrown to the wayside in the vain hope that Big Oil is looking merely at profits instead of ensuring the people of the country get their fair share rather than letting despots who rule the roost gather the benefits derived.

Perhaps Big Oil should take part responsibility in getting the people of that country looked after before they smack a drill-bit in the ground. Maybe they shouldn't pay directly to governments who aren't going to look after the people for them. Ahhhhh, but that's the way governance works in the world, isn't it?

Perhaps it should be the case where Big Oil should just back away until people's rights are recognised.


Regards,

George

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

Gasoline to rise. Our turn to take the hit...
In Newfoundland and Labrador, consumers will wake up to find that pricing for gasoline did, indeed rise a couple of more pennies, to reach an unprecedented level for this time of the year.
Spot pricing for stove oils however, are showing a downwards trend thankfully...
So far, gasoline shows a 2.7 cents a litre increase while stove oils show 1.24 down. That's with two more business days to go.
I expect that both numbers will be less than what I have here with the next two days measurements included. I expect gasoline to show a more moderate increase than what I have and for stove oils to decrease still further.
Keep your ears to the media to hear the details. I'll have a release out in the morning when numbers for "day 13" come into play.
Now, for what's on my mind after all these increases in other jurisdictions the last couple of days...
When I first heard of the latest rounds of "panic buying" I kept wondering how these companies or businesses manage to stay in business without some sort of consumer revolt. I am absolutely amazed that some of these businesses could charge what they did-when they did without any hard evidence to justify such an increase in pricing to the consumer.
Vancouver did not deserve to see pricing that hit $1.32 a litre at the pumps. Nor did Toronto residents who saw an added 10 cents a litre.
Spot pricing for gasoline product peaked at 7 cents from April 22nd to reach 67.1 cents a litre on April 30th...
Just because we're dealing with a "savvy" oil industry that knows they can "do maintenance" to justify a draw on United States gasoline inventory does not justify the move in pricing that consumers saw. Shutdowns for refinery maintenance is taking longer to achieve the last couple of years and the periods that they claim for taking refineries off-line to do it, are getting longer.
Why?
My belief is that refiners want to draw on inventory to drive up pricing simply to recoup the capital costs for such "maintenance". The more time they take in getting refineries up, the less inventory is made available for the summer driving season. The less inventory gives the trader more time to speculate on future pricing of gasoline and other motive fuels and that means higher pricing to be paid for a product that is so important to the consumer.
We're lucky -this time- that our market here in Newfoundland and Labrador, is regulated. What regulation did at this time-frame the last week was take away the initiative for the companies to drive up pricing here. It also protected the consumer from an "artificially created" and imaginary problem that was created by the New York Mercantile Exchange traders. We were, at least partially protected from the hit consumers had to take on the mainland.
Should there be an investigation into the oil company's practises in North America?
Yup!...
Darn tootin'!...
Regards,
George

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

What's got to break?
what will it take to draw down pricing?
I get a lot of people asking me these questions lately...
Maybe it's time I give everyone some answers on what has to change though, and not what will it take...
I've come to learn these things over time. some things here might be hard to understand. If you find it hard, drop me a note and I'll try to explain it later. Sometimes I have the tendency to "over-explain" things and that drives people, even my wife, nuts!
The problem you have on the markets is relatively simple though. What you have is the case where Big Oil closed refineries, we still kept driving as we always did and then some.
In short? While the oil companies "cut back", we didn't... and we also put more drivers on the road at the same time. Inventories are being impacted and, depending on the season, it could either be gasoline or heating oils and distillates that are affected.
We helped create the problem by not asking our car manufacturers to give us better gas mileage. We've created the problem by becoming dependent upon "exterior" sources of supply. We have allowed our own Canadian supply of raw product out of the country to be refined south of the border.
We are the authors of our own demise...
Today, as you are watching your pricing rise, remember the basics that have been created for all to see. Limiting supply to an increasing number of consumers equals trouble. Not asking our governments for better than what we've gotten over the last few years should also have us thinking a little bit into the future on anything that's sucking the bucks out of your pockets.
That's it from me for now,
George

Friday, April 27, 2007


"Nothing doin" budget for gas or heat users

Seems that every budget day, motorists in this province, and indeed across the country, are feeling a little left out when the good times are rolling.
Such has been the case for both the federal and provincial budgets, both of which were abject disappointments when it comes to some form of pricing relief.
Neither budget adressed the issues of high taxation on a commodity that has experienced rapid increases that far outweigh the rate of inflation. Prices aren't going to ease anytime soon either, in case you were wondering. My numbers are still reflecting anywhere between $1.22 to $1.31 a litre for regular unleaded gasoline by the first week of July here in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Here in Newfoundland and Labrador, gasoline taxes amount to almost 16.5 cents on a litre while the sales tax component averages half that again. Last year, the province collected close on $142 million in motive taxes and only invested close on $66 million back into road and ferry infrastructure, a far cry from the amount collected neddless to say.
Is this fair?
I think not...
If you're going to collect a tax for a specific intent, then collect it and SPEND it for it's intended purpose. Don't tell me that the people of Labrador aren't worth hard surface instead of a chip seal experinment. Don't tell me that the province has to wait for something to happen in the west bound lane of the Harbour Arterial road before proper dollars are spent and we see a full accounting of road work...
Heating oil users in Canada this coming winter are going to be in for a shock when they go to fill their tanks. We're not seeing spot prices fall back in the non-demand season for the fuel when it should be. Spot prices are now just slightly below those of last year and just aren't falling back the way they used to a couple of years ago.
Spots for gasoline exceed those of May month last year by something like four cents a litre.
Call me crazy... But in yesterdays budget, would motorists and energy users be better served by a tax break on any motive fuel and a complete removal of the province's taxation component off all forms of heat?
If the province wants to preach about taking charge of it's own house, then why didn't it start with breaking the HST Agreement of 1998 and enter into a "control" of it's own fiscal regime? Why can't we call our own shot on most taxes here in the province and give everyone a break on taxes that are collected at the sales tax level rather than the income tax level?
It sounds a lot easier to do that across the board rather than see income tax breaks that rival the equalization formula.
Income tax or equalization. Can any of us figure out how either works?
Maybe budget time should be turned into something tangible next time. You know...Something we can all sink our teeth into...
Regards,
George


Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Answers from natural resources minister, Gary Lunn
Last month I told you all about a letter I wrote to the natural resources minister in the light of supply failures in Central Canada and what should be done in Canada as a whole, to answer the supply situation.
That can be found in my March 05, 2007 posting...
The letter was also intended to serve to set up an energy clearing warehouse and an inventory reporting system much like the "Energy Information Administration" in the United States.
Here's his reply dated April 12, 2007...
Dear Mr. Murphy,
Thank you for your recent letter regarding the tight supply of gasoline and related commodities. I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your questions and concerns.
I realize the difficulties caused by the recent fuel situationin Ontario.Throughout this period, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) has worked closely with industry and the province to monitor the situation and do whatever was necessary to ensure adequate supplies were available to consumers. In addition, I certainly understand your concerns and those of other Canadians with respect to the negative impacts of increases in energy prices. Higher prices for these and other important commodities raise the cost of living for everyone.
While it is true that the Canadian refining sector has undergone significant rationalization in the last three decades, Canadian markets remain well supplied. Changes in the industry served to make the market more cost effective by closing down small inefficient facilities, which could not have been economically retrofitted to acomodate Canada's cleaner fuel standards and replacing them with new larger installations. Today, canada has more than double the refining capacity at its 19 refineries than it had when there were 44 refineries in the 1960's.
Although the economics would favour new capacity additions, there are a number of competing priorities for these investment dollars. Refining is a capital-intensive business that requires ongoing investment to remain competative. Over the last decade, most new investment dollars have been spent on refinery modifications to implement environmental initiatives and regulations, and to reduce energy intensities.
Industry decisions to construct a new refinery will be based on the perceived long-term economic returns. The slight increase in profit margins that refiners are now seeing is creating an incentive to invest in new capacity. Currently, Shell Canada, Irving Oil and Newfoundland and Labrador Refining Corporation have put forth proposals to build new refineries in Canada. Other companies are evaluating the possibility of expanding current refining capacity. However, these initiatives will take several years to be realized.
Although consumers in Southern Ontario were inconveienced by the decreased availability of petroleum products in February and early March as a rsult of refinery problems and distribution issues, there was always enough supply to meet the demand. This reflects the fact that all suppliers maintain inventories to bridge supply gaps when such unforseen events occur. Companies will always be cautious in drawing down stocks at the onset of a problem until the arrival of new supplies is more certain. Companies always ensure that they always maintain sufficient prduct to supply emergency vehicles and essential services.
Throughout the last few weeks, the government of Canada has worked with the industry and the provinces affected to mitigate any shortages. The Government is committed to ongoing collaboration with all interested parties to ensure adequate supply of petroleum in the interests of all Canadians.
Canada's energy policy continues to have its basis in a freely functioning , open market where companies are free to make business decisions within the regulatory framework that is designed to protect current and future Canadian interests. We consider that prices set in free and competative markets represent the best signals to producers in terms of their investment decisions, and to consumers in terms of the type of energy they use and how they use it. This helps to ensure that sufficient supplies are available at the most competative price.
Statistics Canada collects and compiles a wide variety of petroleum data relating to production and consumption. Tjhis data is available publicly through Statistics Canada's monthly Supply and Distribution of Refined Petroleum Products in Canada publication. The latest addition is available at the following web site:
http:www.statscan.ca/bsolc/english/bsolc?catno=45-004-XWE
For further weekly petroleum pricing, information on oil and petroleum product markets and ways to manage energy costs, I encourage you to visit NRCan's Fuel Focus website at www.fuelfocus.nrcan.gc.ca.
Again, thank you for writing on this important matter.
Yours sincerely
Minister's signature

Tuesday, April 24, 2007


Prices to drop slightly...
Nothing to get excited over when "supply and demand" are manipulated
Looks like consumers in Newfoundland and Labrador will see some kind of relief, but it's nothing to get excited over...
Gasoline should drop by something in the order of 6/10ths of a cent while stove oils should drop somewhere in the order of 3/4 of a cent on a litre.
Continuing draws against inventories, consumer demand are among the factors. Look as well to Nigeria, Iraq, Iran and the list goes on...
Look at refiner capacity though, when you think about draws on inventory. I look at those numbers from the Energy Information Administration on a regular basis and what they see is not what is reported to the consumer in such a way as to be understood.
There is a "fine line"...
See...It's like this. When I see that refiner capacity is down and I see that the consumer is drawing on present refined inventory, it's only normal to assume that pricing on any product will go up. In this case, I think that Big Oil knows that and plays with "capacity" on a regular basis.
Why wouldn't they?...
If you knew that everyone would pay more for a product if you slowed down production, wouldn't you slow production? That means you could save on labour, electrical costs and, in general improve on your bottom line-your shareholders would love you for it.
You know that the world is thirsty and you know that you have what they want. If you can hide behind the excuse of "maintenance" then why not? Seems like refinery maintenance takes longer than it used to. It's been several weeks now and no great increase in "capacity".
Either way we look at it, the rules of "supply and demand" have been successfully manipulated and there's no Competition Act in Canada to protect the consumer from that.
Regards!
George

Tuesday, April 10, 2007


Price for gas to increase in Newfoundland and Labrador

Houston, we have a problem...
Unlike the Apollo mission those many years ago, what we are witness to is a supply/demand market that needs a little oxygen, something it hasn't had in a long time...
Newfoundland and Labrador consumers will be subject to another increase at the pumps come this Thursday morning. Another 3.4 cents on a litre to be exact.
Stove oils are pointing down only slightly, with 13 days out of a possible 14 days measured. That could even be gone by the end of the day barring any divine intervention, not likely to happen with Easter gone!
Heating oils and diesels may in fact, show no appreciable change as a result of seeing early interruption last week.
Here's what's bugging me this time around though...
For a while now, I've been hearing refineries speak about shutting down for some needed winter maintenance ahead of the demand season for refining gasolines. They've been shut down for a while now, almost six weeks since I heard the first of them switch-over from distillate refining to gasolines.
That's an awfully long time considering some of the early turn-arounds I used to hear about some years back but, this time is more unusual than most.
While it's true they need some time to do their maintenance thing, should it be true that they should do it in the time that used to be set aside for the building of gasoline inventories? Because there is a drain on gasoline inventories at a time they used to build, consumers will have to pay higher pricing this coming summer as a result.
All the companies had to do was switch the time they did the maintenance thing, and we'll get to pay for it!
It's at that time of year as well, when they start on gasolines, that they build distillate inventories. Let's see what they do with those this summer and fall.
Regards for now,
George

Tuesday, April 03, 2007



Possible interruption to heating,diesel and stove oil pricing

From the look of things and the markets this last week or so, it looks like Newfoundland and Labrador consumers will probably be looking at possible interruptions to all distillate-type fuels.

As of the last six business days since the last adjustment, I have numbers that show that stove oils will take a 4.32 cent per litre hike. Like I said, that's over six days.

The Public Utilities Board needs a seven day fix to determine pricing adjustments.

As of today, we'd still have to see a substantial drop in distillate trading on the markets. Breaking news from the Middle East shows that Britain is looking at getting a negotiated settlement with Iran and that's starting to show on the distillate markets. Question here is: Is the trading day drop going to be enough to thwart any need for upwards adjustment?

In order for a "no adjustment scenario" on stove oils, we'd have to see the price come down by something in the order of 1.4 cents on a litre. As of 2:45pm Newfoundland time, that number was 1.2 cents a litre-perilously close to my margin for error!

Diesel, heating oils and stove oils are all part of the distillate group of fuels so, just because I only have the numbers for stove oils, it doesn't mean that we won't see adjustments to the other fuels like diesel and heating oils.

I'd be more inclined to fill the tank rather than let this one slide. Numbers are up enough that, if we don't see them increase tonight, they will possibly go up next Thursday anyways.

Regards!

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Gas "up" but heating down...

Well...Now that we're starting to get winter behind us maybe we'll start to see something "constructive" happen with heating and stove oil pricing.

I can't say the same thing about gasoline, although it could have been a lot worse than what I'm seeing out there. Consider the world situation before you assome we might get a break at the pumps though, because we're not.

So far, with another business day to go before we see prices adjusted, we're looking at around a cent up on gasoline.

Stove oil prices are starting to nose down a little, around 1.55 cents a litre down for this adjustment period.

That's about 5.8 cents a US gallon down to our friends south of the border.

Like I said, that's with 13 out of 14 days recorded. I'll have a "definitive" on Wednesday morning.

So, what are we looking at out there?

We've had some more fires at refineries again, this time a couple in Indiana of all places. I'm just waiting to hear of a loss of life at refineries as the oil companies try to keep the dollars ahead of demand. I can't wait to hear a Big Oil company explain to the media why it wasn't pratising good safety measures when their refinery blows up. Keping ahead of the supply/demand curve is getting to be a chalklenge that Big Oil is finding hard to meet. Unfortunately, we get to pay more for that notion.

Inventories are getting hit hard as a result as well. Consumers still haven't seen a brick wall on pricing, although this increase isn't a substantial one, it still signifies we have a way to go before consumers realize they're being tagged for their own consumption, far beyond the actual value of the stuf they're putting in the tanks. We are, in fact, the authors of our own demise on pricing.

The more we ignore the rise, the more apt we are to make a heavy impact on inventories, which means?...You guessed it..the more we impact the price.

$1.13 and change might not sound like a lot to consumers elsewhere like Europe, but it sure is a heck of a lot here, and it's going to get worse.

See, this is the season when, directly before the summer deand season, we see increases in gasoline inventory, in spite of refinery shutdowns.

Not this year...

I think this is the first year I have seen in my ten years of analysing pricing that gasoline "user season" has actually matched the demand for distillates in the winter season.

Another analogy and a little prediction too. You are going to witness the summer season become matched to the gasoline demand season. Why?

Jet fuel demand is up and, if the economy remains strong, distillates like diesel will be in hreavy use just to keep the goods moving to eager consumers.

When the tractor trailers move, pricing does too.

That means a higher starting point for which heating and stove oils have to begin the run-up in pricing for next winter. Not enough time to build inventories and a strong demand.

Could be a cold one for some...

Lastly. Keep an eye to the Iran and United Nations situation, all over Iran's "want" of a nuclear program. They think they have the right to produce energy by nuclear programming while the world outside of the Russians and China seem to think they don't. The "arrest" of 15 British sailors from the HMS Cornwall in the Persian Gulf will also start to figure on pricing as the Middle East again heats up bringing pricing up along with it.

See what happens on Thursday but pass the word for now...

Regards,

George


Tuesday, March 20, 2007


Equalization hullabaloo

The realities of the equalization pact between provinces and the federal government are specifically for one purpose; that of getting provincial governments off the "welfare" roles and give them the opportunity to prosper using the resources they have at hand, new or old.

What the latest Tory government program has said to Newfoundland and Labrador seems to ride hand in hand with any governments policy on welfare or employment insurance; "You've got yourself in a position where you can make an abundance of money so, it's time to take you off the welfare roles".

Far be it for me to say that, perhaps we have come into the future because it wouldn't be politically correct to say that. This equalization program that has put the "screws" to Newfoundland and Labrador comes hand in hand with what we are told is happening to our offshore resources, that we are seeing big benefits from our offshore resources. While we hear the provincial tories saying that it's all good here on the Rock, the federal government seems to recognize the fact as well and that seems to be whats got the "bee in Danny's bonnet".

The whole purpose of the Atlantic Accord was to advance the offshore industries to the point that we could see the ultimate benefits like Alberta does, but the irksome realisation is that we can't see that for the forest that has grown before our eyes, created by the present administration in the province. It was Brian Mulroney who said that he "wasn't afraid to inflict prosperity on the people of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador".

Maybe the feds really weren't afraid to do it. Maybe we were afraid to accept the reality that we would profit by the offshore accord signed in 1985.Are we afraid of seeing the money come in? Are we getting paranoid of making deals so much that we can't accept the status quo on this one?

I don't think we got the screws on this one. I think we saw the premier put the screws to us. He hasn't signed a deal and time is running out now on the Atlantic Accord. The reality is that the Atlantic Accord could be a story of lost opportunity five years from now.

How so?....

It's like this. Had we seen the other offshore fields progress to the point that they were bringing in untold revenues, would we really care if we had to receive equalization again?

That's the question that none of the Try provincial politicians seems to want to answer.

Are we afraid of making a deal?


Thursday, March 08, 2007

The Offshore Oil Industry is now on Life Support

...but, what do I know about the oil industry...

So, I'm thinking after reading the Globe and Mail article that, maybe the offshore oil industry has just been put on life support.

Hibernia South...Hebron-Ben Nevis...

We don't have a fishery that would be worthy of the inshore fisherman to talk about. The economic powerhouse, the center of trade for large fishing companies that was St. John's, was thrust inexhorably into the oil industry just a short 25 years ago, with oil rigs punching holes in the seabed some 200 miles out in the search for "light-sweet".

Houses bloomed in areas where we tore down the trees and then named the subdivisions after wood groves of them. People from distant countries who were used to starting up the engines of oil-based economies moved here and set up home, wives shopping at the malls while the men in the suits worked in the "towers" of the old, musty, fish-scented downtown core.

There was hope in some of those buildings, and in the buildings where the politicians fought, that "have nots would be no more",... that "I'm not afraid to inflict prosperity on the people of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador"...

I guess after today, we may have found out that someone in the Confederation Building just might be afraid to inflict prosperity on the people, huh?

Today, Exxon-Mobil packed up their dinkies and they're now heading out to play with some other kids in their sandbox. Today, we found out that Exxon-Mobil has written off their offshore interests until sometime after the year 2010.

For some reason, I think my property here in Paradise just lost a couple of thousand dollars in value.

Can I sue for that I wonder??

They've parked a project that could have brought Newfoundland and Labrador off transfer payments and we wouldn't have given a damn if the federal finance minister had paid us a visit again...

Now that we won't have those revenues, those offshore jobs, those economic spin-offs from the industry, well....I guess we just found out that the province just hit the brick wall and we'll all be saying "good-bye" at the airport a few more times yet.

And, I guess we'll be seeing a whole lot more of the federal finance minister again...

Faint hope, I guess...