Does anyone understand the Green Shift yet?
Really...
I'm not the world's greatest environmentalist but, in an effort to understand the Green Shift, one is going to have to take the initiative to find out if there is a financial benefit to the "shift". I guess the secondary thought in all this is that, if you have to think about it, you're probably not in tune with any environment concerns that pop up in the news.
Maybe some of us simply don't care anyway...
My house and the Green Shift"
Either way, the Liberal Party has come out with their "Green Shift" and, in an attempt to understand what it will cost my household, I used their calculate to total our benefit. I them used a handy online carbon footprint calculator and got a good idea of what the proposed $40 per tonne carbon tax would costs my family.
The results?
Based on an estimated $49,000 per year total family income, according to the Green Shift calculator on the Liberal.ca website, my household would receive an annual benefit of $2090.00 per year.
According to a handy, carbon calculator I found online, I would be taxed, at $40 per tonne, or $458.68 per year. That means our household will benefit by $1631.32 a year.
As a sideline, because I know a lot of people are concerned about being "nailed" by carbon taxes on heating fuels, I also did a calculation based on 3000 litres a year of heating oil. It added an extra 1.146 tons of CO2 emissions and, thusly another $45.84 annually to my expenses.
Now, here's what I didn't like about my introduction to the Green Shift program...
When I went to a meeting held in Mount Pearl a few weeks ago, I asked the question about how the government thinks that costs associated with carbon would not be passed down to motorists. At the meeting, Bob Rae told us all that there would be tax breaks to the oil companies for the retrofit and purchase of equipment that would be used to reduce the impact of CO2 emissions. If anyone thinks that the costs associated with making things a little bit greener at the refinery is not going to be handed down to the consumer in the form of higher prices for gasoline, he's living in a dreamworld.In this case, it's Mr.Rae. He came here to give the right message but screwed the pooch on it...
Ahem...
I have a problem with granting tax breaks to Big Oil at a time when they are making huge profits off the backs of consumers who can't afford the prices they are being charged yet, have to buy because they need it. The Liberals are going to have to try and explain that one. We're already on an "enforced" reduction in greenhouse gases...
The second thought I have on the issue is that, while I may be able to afford to take a hit "up front" with carbon taxes, the Liberals are going to have to promise to take the hit "up front" to prove to the consumer/taxpayer that this is a good thing-especially for those people on a fixed or lower income like seniors. They will need the money up-front just to help pay the extras that the Green Shift will put on them. If you're going to start taxing heating oil in year one of the carbon tax plan, you're going to have to provide everyone with "an advance" to get them over the hump of extra taxes on heat. Again, we're also going to be dealing with an added tax on heat which, as far as I am concerned, should never be. Consumers now are being forced to conserve on heat because they can't afford to pay more for what they need! The product price itself is forcing a "Green Shift" and we already know about the GST charged for heat...
It should have been a different "Green Shift"...
Canadians recognise the fact that we have to reduce our carbon footprint I think, but why did we have to go this way first before making an attempt at introducing other viable energy options that wuld compete against the carbon causes? Why doesn't one government do an assessment of Canada's energy needs for the future, in the form of a national energy plan, and introduce that as a "competitor" against the use of carbon-causing energy producers now? In other words, while heating oils are a cause for carbon emissions, why not introduce cheap electricity to encourage the consumer to choose that form of energy to keep warm rather than use petroleum products that are artificially supported by NYMEX investors?
Here's my reasoning and, some might even think it's nuts...
Let's take Churchill Falls...
If the idea is to make available cheaper energy and cleaner energy, is there none more cleaner than hydro or wind power? If the government were to give the province a loan guarentee to ensure the availability of more electricity to the North American grid, would it not then become a major player in keeping down electricity costs elsewhere in North America? Is the government going to tell us that an National Energy Plan that would include a Lower Churchill project would not be sold to the people of Quebec if the Quebec consumer was told, and it was proven, that their electricity costs could help break the OPEC dependency and that they could make the switch from oil generated heat to electricity? Would the Lower Churchill help in greenhouse gas emissions by taking some of that same electricity that is oil-generated in Holyrood offline and shutting down the world's sixth largest emitter of CO2? Would heavy investment in wind generation or tidal generation help to reduce the Canada carbon footprint? I say 'yes' and I think it's high time that this country takes stock of it's abilities when it comes to being "carbon free". We need a Green Shift alright but, we need it on a national perspective as well...
What we need is a "natinal energy inventory" done. A 'Where can we get it', 'the benefit to the consumer and industry' and a 'for what costs' type of program...
Numbers this week
Speaking of pricing, data used to make predictions on pricing movements has been weak the last two weeks and there is simply not enough to make a prediction that will stick. My sources are starting to dry up a little I think. I'm working on some other methods that I hope will come to fruition so, stay tuned. Numbers that I do have show a modest drop in heating oils of 1.7 cents and no change for gasoline; that's with a bare seven days data out of fourteen needed.
Summary
People are going to have to make up their own minds about the Green Shift. I know that, for the information I have, there appears to be some financial benefit to our household against what it program is initially intended for. We have to do something to protect the environment but, it also appears that there is only one party with some sort of a plan, as problematic as what it may appear to some...
Hope all this helps!
regards,
George